CrunchGear

CrunchGear

Link to CrunchGear

Disney Japan Shows Its Android 3D Phone With Access To The “Disney Market”

Posted: 28 Jan 2011 03:09 AM PST

Remember that Disney-themed Android phone from Japan we blogged two weeks ago? At that time, Disney Japan didn't release a lot of information, but now they did [JP], and they also showed the 3D device for the first time. Read the rest on MobileCrunch.


Excuse Our Dust – We’re Migrating To Disqus

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 05:47 PM PST


We’ve had more or less the same comment system since the early days of CrunchGear, but what with the mothership switching over to Disqus and our own system creaking under the weight of tens of thousands of posts, we’ve decided the time is right to make the switch. If there are some issues with your comments over the next day or so, we apologize, but we’ll try to make sure the transition is as smooth as possible. It’s working through the backlog now:


OH GOD, it’s going to take forever! And incredibly, it converts the most recent comments last! Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. Don’t worry, your old comments still live, and you can still comment in the meantime. Email us at Tips@CrunchGear.com.


Wi-Fi Flip Camera Hits FCC, Launches In May?

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 05:20 PM PST


We’ve heard for a while now that Cisco plans to put out a Flip camera with wi-fi built in, but so far the rumors haven’t produced an actual product. Until now.

The FCC has taken a gander at a new digital video camera from Cisco that has 802.11a/b/g/n support. The confidentiality request asks that setup photos remain confidential May 1st, so I’m guessing that’s when they’re going official with it. Not much beyond this, but I’d say we’re looking at the real thing here.

[via Wireless Goodness]


That’s Two Million Galaxy Tabs Served

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 05:00 PM PST


Two million! Good for Samsung! Although I can’t say I’d advise anyone to buy one of these devices, the Galaxy Tab probably was the best (if not the most affordable) of the 2010 stopgap generation of tablets. The sales of the iPad dwarf this, of course (nearly 8 million in the same period), but hey, like they say, first is worst, second is best, and third is… HP, I guess.

Seriously, though, don’t buy one until you see the sequel, which might be announced in like two weeks.

[via Electronista]


Five Reasons The PSP2 Won’t Succeed

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 04:30 PM PST


[Excuse the comment confusion below, guys, we're migrating to Disqus, all will be well soon.]

Sony has announced the PSP2 (temporarily named the “Next Generation Portable”), perhaps the final boss of handheld consoles. It’s far more powerful than its destined competitor, Nintendo’s 3DS, and incorporates social and locational data, 3G, a monster 5″ OLED screen, and a number of other features detailed here. It is to be one of the linchpin platforms for the world’s most recognizable entertainment electronics company, a stomping ground for new games, media, and services. And I think it’s going to go down in flames.

Why? It’s got its competitor beat on nearly every spec, it’s got the backing of droves of Sony fanboys, and million-selling franchises just waiting to be put on its crisp 960×544 screen. How can it fail? I’d say by not addressing the fundamental needs of a handheld gaming console and ignoring strong trends in the market.

Before I start, I just want to register my admiration of the Sony team in putting together such an impressive piece of hardware. No one can fault that. Sony is firing on all cylinders — but in my humble opinion, in the wrong direction. Here are the reasons why I feel they’re going to be steamrolled by Nintendo (and Apple) over the next three years.

No truly unique gaming features

Don’t misunderstand me: the PSP has plenty of unique features. Its excellent screen, its weird hot-pants touchpad on the back, dual analog sticks, the 3G connection. But it doesn’t have what some might call a gimmick. The DS’s touchscreen and the Wii’s motion control were called gimmicks when they launched, though perhaps that term was misapplied, since now those devices are the two best selling consoles of their generations. The reason is this: when you have a unique gameplay element like two screens, every game for your system is made for that system. With a few exceptions in which the extra functionality is tacked on, DS games are unique among handheld and console games because they have to be fundamentally designed around the gaming hardware, which makes those games both original and closely allied to the system. Nintendo hopes they can pull this trick again with the 3DS.

That isn’t the case with the PSP. They’ve made an insanely powerful and compact sandbox in which developers are free to create… exactly the kind of games they create for every other system. On that note:

Big-screen gaming is big-screen for a reason

The PSP2 promises “PS3-level” graphics and sound. I find it difficult to understand why you would want a big-screen experience packed onto a small screen. That’s not to say that graphics are worthless, and it’s nice having the capability if you’re a developer, but even on that great 5″ screen, you’re going to have trouble appreciating the grand vistas of Monster Hunter or the atmosphere of Resident Evil. Add into this the fact that most of the big-name properties (Call of Duty, God Of War, Metal Gear Solid) will have big-screen counterparts, and your PS3-level graphics and sound start to seem redundant. Wouldn’t you rather have a game truly made for the small screen, designed around portability and accessibility, not a smaller, slightly modified version of a full-fledged console game?

The best-selling games on the PSP were indeed console-style games — because that’s what was on offer. Meanwhile, the top DS games outsold the PSP’s best-seller (Monster Hunter Freedom Unite, 3.1m sold) by an order of magnitude. Pointing a shrink ray at AAA games just isn’t that popular of a proposition.

More than ever before, people are seeing big-budget games for what they are: popcorn entertainment, loud and unoriginal, being released by the same production houses, with the same stars, same set pieces, and same gameplay. Not that they’re all bad or anything — we all like to watch movies like Transformers or Avatar now and again, mainly for the purpose of mindless escapism, which is a perfectly good reason. But would you buy a TV that only showed popcorn flicks?

AAA games are no longer a killer app

Some of the most interesting and best-selling games to come out in the last few years have been out-of-nowhere semi-casual games with mass appeal. Angry Birds has sold 50 million copies. That’s about twice the total sales of the top fifteen PSP games combined. Of course, it costs far less and is on more platforms, so you can say it’s apples and oranges. But that’s the thing: apples are being sold at the same stand as oranges now, and the big Transformers tie-in or the best handheld version of Modern Warfare isn’t where the gaming market is putting its money. The PSP2 doesn’t need to mimic Apple too much, but let’s be honest, they’ve got a touchscreen and a 3G connection, they’re already halfway there.

They’ve got a great thing going with PSN: like XBLA, it’s packed full of smart young developers pushing interesting, unique ideas and bite-sized games for bargain-bin prices. Yet the PSP2 is clearly focused in the other direction, towards satisfying the needs of Rockstar, EA, Infinity Ward, and the like. This maximizes cost per unit and minimizes the audience, since it’s clear that handheld gaming (including iOS and Android, since those really are becoming real competitors) is going towards… it’s not casual, exactly, but it’s certainly different from what the PSP2 was made to do.

The social and locational features will never hit critical mass

The key element in any social application is ubiquity. Facebook works because everyone’s on it. iPhone social apps work because there are a ton of iPhones and Android is on its way. Nintendo’s DS-to-DS functionality is good because in Tokyo, you’re never more than seven or eight feet from another DS. But will the PSP2 ever hit the level of ubiquity necessary for its (admittedly slick-looking) social features to work? Or will thousands of gamers check their “radar” and see nothing but empty space?

My guess is the latter, though to be fair that guess is based on my opinion that sales will be slow. Plus, with the system so plainly aimed at big, single-player experiences, it seems like the social thing is sort of mismatched. Is this thing for gaming, or socializing? What about the Playstation app, where does that fit in? And the new “Playstation Phone”? It seems to me that their initially fragmented social experience will torpedo it from the start.

It could have been something completely different, but it’s more of the same

Sony is going all-in on a pair of jacks. Sure, it’s better than nothing, but they could have folded and picked up a new hand altogether. Bear with me for a second. What if the new PSP had completely eschewed the big game experience, and was focused entirely on PSN downloadables like PixelJunk games and back-catalog stuff? Imagine: the lowered specs (as powerful but more efficient than a PSP) would have enabled a lighter and thinner device that could be sold for peanuts. Can you imagine a brand new PSP with access to all PSN games selling for $150? I can. And with seed money and a little cajoling in the right places, it could have launched with dozens of original and exclusive titles that focused not on aping the PS3, but on setting this unique mobile device apart from the tablets, consoles, and handsets of the world.

I would have bought one, and after some initial concerns about the library and some bucking by the “hardcore” that there won’t be enough Killzone, millions of others would have, too.


The main problem with the PSP2 is simply that it is an inferior version of an existing (though popular) platform: the PS3, or more generally, the home console and media station that the PS3 and 360 are becoming. If Sony could have focused its big-money games on its long-term bet, the PS3, and made the PSP into an original and compelling platform rather than a PS3 Lite. They could have caught a ride on the new-world-of-gaming wave, but instead, they chose to keep on paddling.


Sony Wins Restraining Order Against Geohot, Updates PS3 Firmware To 3.56 In Effort To Stop Hacking

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 03:15 PM PST

Flickr’d

PS3 owners will be prompted to update their system to firmware version 3.56 today. Why is that? Hmm, could it possibly have something to do with Sony trying to prevent your from jailbreaking your system? Yes, obviously. ("This is a minor update that adds a security patch.") If you update your system say goodbye to being able to hack your PS3 to pieces… for now, at least. And maybe for a good while, too, given that Sony has managed to win a restraining order against Geohot.

Not only has Sony won a temporary restraining order against Geohot, real name George Hotz, and his crew, but it looks like the case will be able to be held in San Francisco, in front of judges who haven't been too kind to lone coder types before.

The 3.56 update was pushed out within the past few hours, so it'll be interesting to see if A) it stops jailbreaking for good or B) will merely signify a new game of cat-and-mouse between Sony and the larger jailbreaking community. I seem to remember frequent PSP firmware updates back in the day that were designed to mitigate the effects of custom firmware, but, really, once the system was cracked it was pretty much cracked for good.

And even if you were to jailbreak your PS3, please don't hop online and ruin everyone's good time. Nobody likes a bully.


17x17x17 Puzzle Cube Makes Rubik’s Look Like Child’s Play

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 02:55 PM PST


So, you’re a big Rubik’s cube buff. Can solve any cube in five minutes, think people who can’t are fools? Well, sounds like you need a new challenge. How about this 17x17x17 puzzle cube by puzzle designer Oskar van Deventer, and printed using Shapeways? Should keep you busy for a few years.

Too bad it costs two thousand dollars, whaaat!


Microsoft Sold 8 Million Kinects In 60 Days

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 02:19 PM PST

Microsoft earnings just got released 10 minutes before market close, and aside from growing revenues 5% in the 2nd quarter to $19.95 Billion, their slides reveal some interesting numbers on their entertainment and gaming unit, mainly that they sold 8 million Kinects in the two months since launch.

Said Peter Klien about the Kinect’s success, "We are enthusiastic about the consumer response to our holiday lineup of products, including the launch of Kinect. The 8 million units of Kinect sensors sold in just 60 days far exceeded our expectations. The pace of business spending, combined with strong consumer demand, led to another quarter of operating margin expansion and solid earnings per share growth."

Read More


Razer Releases Special “Black Edition” Of My Favorite Mouse, The Death Adder

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 02:00 PM PST


When I look back over all the mice I’ve reviewed in my time, one particular thing always comes to mind: “What the hell are you doing with your life?” But then I get over it, dry my tears, and continue thinking about how many mice come and go, but there are a few that still stand out as the best. The Death Adder is one of them; I reviewed it a couple years back, after it had already been out for some time, and although I love me some G500 and Xai, the Death Adder is still number one with me. So you can be sure I’m happy to see it given some love in the form of a new special edition.

The “Black Edition” Death Adder is just that: black. On account of its complexion. The funny thing is, it was already black. Yes, I’m looking at mine right now, definitely black.

It does have a white scroll wheel, though. So they’ve fixed that. And there’s a new non-slip rubber coating on the side, where the old one had slick plastic. The logo doesn’t light up anymore, either. I’m okay with that.

At any rate, it’s still a great mouse, and now you can buy one for the same price they were at three years ago: $60! Yay!


Sharp & Pioneer Resurrect The Pioneer Elite Display Line

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 01:21 PM PST

(My son a few years back in front of a 60-inch Pioneer Elite plasma. He *loved* it.)

There was a time when the Pioneer Elite display was the cream of the crop, the top dog, the big kid on the bus, you know, the best damn TV available. But even having the best color and black level reproduction on the market, the expensive line couldn’t withstand the recession and the onslaught of cheap LCDs and plasmas. Pioneer killed the Elite display line in 2009 and a little part of the world died with it.

But it’s back! Sharp’s licensing the Elite brand from Pioneer and the two companies will jointly market the product line. The models will wear only Elite branding, not Sharp or Pioneer. These will be Elite HDTVs, but will be available in the Prioneer Elite dealer network. No time frame was given, but these displays were so good that it might be worth delaying the purchase of your high-end Panasonic plasma or Samsung LCD until these models hit.


Saddleback iPad Case Promises 100 Years Of Thick, Lustrous Leather

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 01:00 PM PST


You may remember our review during last year’s bag week of the Saddleback laptop case. Expensive, durable, and fervently religious, it’d be a good bag to have during the end times. And depending on whether said Armageddon happens before or after the iPad 2 announcement, you might want some righteous armor for your iPad, too. Not iPad 2. iPad too. Good thing Saddleback now makes an iPad case that protects your touchscreen treasure better than the ark of the covenant.

Okay, enough teasing. The Saddleback case is made of mega-thick leather and really does offer a 100-year warranty. You can get a lining of either pigskin or suede, and the straps fold back over (like the M-Edge Platform I reviewed) to secure it in an upright state. It comes in brown, brown, brown, and black.

By the way, read the “common questions” – very funny.


This Is The T-Mobile Sidekick 4G

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 12:43 PM PST

Do you know how much I loved the original Sidekick? Seriously — Picture me spreading my arms REALLY, REALLY far apart, as if I’m bragging about the size of a fish I caught. That’s how much I loved the original Sidekick. It was, for the most part, the first phone that made me really, really like phones.

Then the Sidekick 2 came along, and it was amazing. Then the Sidekick 3 came along, and it was… not as amazing. Then a bevy of crappy Sidekicks came along and sort of stomped all over the Sidekick name.

Well, friend, the Sidekick is back. And it’s running Android.
Read the rest at MobileCrunch, because OMG OMG OMG NEW SIDEKICK >>


Tracing The Origins Of Leaked Oscar Screeners

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 12:30 PM PST

The Oscar nominations came out a few days ago, and like a bunch of dorks we've been discussing the merits of each movie in our little chatroom. So far we've unofficially given thumbs up to Winter's Bone and Black Swan, while Devin and Greg have admitted to liking The Social Network. (I patently refuse to watch the movie.) Why am I bringing this up? Because every year around this time unscrupulous individuals leak their Oscar screeners to the Internet, allowing the rest of us to join in on the fun.

One enterprising gentleman has put together a spreadsheet with various screener-related information for your perusal. It's actually a continuation of a long-running spreadsheet, tracing the origins of screeners, leaks, cam copies, and the like for the past several years.

For example, we learn that Toy Story 3, nominated for best picture, was first released in theaters on June 18. The screener came out on November 12, and the Blu-ray first leaked on September 9. What member of the Academy would wait for his or her screener when the Blu-ray was officially released more than a month prior? Beats me.

The urgency of piracy is actually an interesting way of looking at the popularity of movies, and watching piracy trends could predict the success (or lack thereof) of movies like Children of Men and The Hurt Locker, which were leaked long before their US release dates, or others which for whatever reason were never popular online in cam format. It’s a rich well of information, if you’re into that kind of thing.


The Briefest Of Introductions To Modern Video Game Emulators: Dolphin, PCSX2 & More

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 10:30 AM PST

It's probably a snow day for many of you, so what better way to kill a few hours than to fire up an emulator? "But Nicholas," you interrupt, "there are so many emulators out there, and so much conflicting information. I wouldn't know how to start if my life depended on it!" Don't throw away your life—there's so much beauty in the world! With this handy guide you should be well on your way to understanding the wonderfully exciting world of emulators. Fingers crossed.

PCSX2
PS2 emulator for the PC

An open source project, PCSX2 is the PS2 emulator out there. It's in active development, and it's compatible with pretty much every game I've thrown at it. What you see here is a screenshot of Final Fantasy XII running at three times its native resolution. That's the beauty of emulation: not only can you play these games on your PC, but there's a very good chance they'll look better than they did on their original console.

PCSX2 isn't too difficult to set up, particularly if you have any emulator experience under your belt. You download the latest version from the official site (or you can go with an unofficial SVN build, which is newer but not guaranteed to work as well), then you configure the application. Nothing too hard here: map your keyboard or controller (I use a wired Xbox 360 controller for all my emulator needs), configure the graphics plugin, and off you go. I'd go into greater detail, but if you can't figure out how to point the emulator to a folder containing the PS2 bios then perhaps you should stick to Angry Birds.

Games, games, games. Luckily it's pretty easy to create ISOs of your PS2 discs. (You could also procure PS2 games by using "other means," but that's none of my business.) I tend to use ImgBurn, primarily because it's free and it's fast. Throw your disc in your drive, launch ImgBurn, click "Create image file from disc," wait a few minutes, and then you have a nice, shiny ISO to feed PCSX2.

Now, to emulate PS2 games, particularly if you're keen on running the games at high internal resolutions, you'll need a bit of horsepower; don't expect to be able to play Final Fantasy XII on your three-year-old laptop with an Intel integrated graphics processor. But the beauty is that GPUs are so inexpensive these days, particularly the new 6000 series, that for $200-ish you'll be sitting pretty. Then you'll also be able to play PC games at modern resolutions, something that can't really be said about something like the Xbox 360.

Dolphin
Wii and GameCube emulator for the PC

Ah, Dolphin, a delightful little application that I've mentioned before. Given that the Wii is basically a GameCube that took its vitamins, said its prayers, and drank its milk, Dolphin runs Wii and GameCube games equally well. You can even stick a Bluetooth adapter in your PC and use an actual Wii controller to play games. (Or you can be a normal person and just buy a Wii!)

Like PCSX2, it's plugin-based, so you download the latest version (or, again, an unofficial SVN build) then set up your controller, sound settings, your graphics settings, etc. Again, like PCSX2, you can set up Dolphin to run games at higher resolutions than you'll find on their actual consoles. ImgBurn can again be used to rip your Wii ISOs. (I've actually no idea how to rip GameCube games, but I still have a GameCube kicking around, so if I ever have an urge to play Metroid Prime again I'll just play that the old fashioned way.)

Embedded above is a video of me playing the Wii version of Resident Evil 4 (I own all versions of Resident Evil 4 because I'm a dork like that). It ran closer to 60 frames per second, but Fraps maxes video recording out at 30 frames per second.

Dolphin also runs most games out there, judging by its official forums. Like with every emulator out there you'll run into some glitches here and there, but games are totally playable. I know I played the first level of Donkey Kong Country returns using Dolphin just fine, but then I stopped. What usually happens is that I spend hours and hours setting up these emulators, then play the games for 15 minutes just for the satisfaction of seeing them work. Then I'll turn off my computer and read a book.

All the rest
Pretty much every system for every operating system

There are plenty of other emulators out there, of course, but I don't have 800 hours to enumerate them all here; I suggest you tool around EmuCR and see what tickles your fancy. There's emulators for the Dreamcast, Saturn, N64, PS1, SNES, Genesis, NES, Mega Drive, you name it. Older consoles can even be emulated on your phone, provided you have Android or a jailbroken iPhone. Clearly this is a gray area at best when it comes to obtaining the ROMs for these emulators, but I'm not here to judge you nor am I here to tell you where to find them. Your business is your business; the big CPU in the sky will judge you when the time comes.


Mommy Mittens: You Know, For Mommies

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 09:49 AM PST

Baby it’s cold outside and, if you’re parents to a young child, you probably currently have no dignity. So why not get some Mommy Mittens? These things look like the rubber and duct tape hand guards the delivery guys around Brooklyn tape to their scooter handlebars to keep themselves warm but they attach to your stroller instead! And they’re “water resistant, insulated and lined with fleece for a cozy experience.”

While the obvious question to ask here is “Why not wear gloves?” I think it’s important to note that parents of young children are often easily confused and bewildered and basically you could tell them that babies need special “mystical toenail clippers” if you want them to get into Yale and they’d buy ten sets. Heck, just think about the whole “Get your boys circumcised” hoax. Doctors and religious authorities have been laughing over that one for centuries now! Luckily, Mommy Mittens cost a mere $30 and come in multiple colors and if you don’t buy them your baby will develop the croup and nobody wants that, right? Good. Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to go change a diaper and grab another glass or three of wine.

Product Page via FIPS


An Ode To The Graphic Adventure

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 08:40 AM PST

I remember going over to a friend’s house back in the 1980s. His dad had something called a PC and when you turned it on instead of making showing a READY prompt it did something strange. After a quick beep, something inside started churning and in a minute you saw a menu of games and programs available on something called a “hard disk,” which I assumed were the standard 3 1/2 inch “hard disks” I’d seen in computer magazines. After hitting a key, we began to play a game called “King’s Quest.” The graphics were bright and fluid – although they were, in fact, green on black – and the story was amazing. You’re a dude! Looking for a princess! There’s a frog! With a ball! What was this sorcery?

That game, King’s Quest from Sierra, was one of the first Graphic Adventures, a mixture of text and graphics-based play that created an entire generation of hardcore gamers.

Ars has a great piece on the phenomenon and talks about the many innovations that, in the end, defined the way we game today. For example, take this chunk of info:

In 1991, LucasArts developed iMUSE—the Interactive Music Streaming Engine—as a new audio component of SCUMM. Composers Michael Land and Peter McConnell were behind the engine, which overcame many of the limitations of MIDI technology. Hard cuts and jarring music transitions were a thing of the past; SCUMM-powered adventures now had dynamic audio. This put the company at an immediate competitive advantage—none of its rivals had such a technology, which allowed far more interesting and subtle audio cues than ever before found in games. The new technology saw its first use in Monkey Island 2: LeChuck’s Revenge, which was SCUMM-creator Ron Gilbert’s last game with LucasArts (Gilbert left to found Humungous Entertainment with colleague Shelley Day).

Betcha didn’t know about that, right? Sadly, at least to me, the genre’s last great game was Myst. The adventure I loved, though, was Neuromancer and it’s the game that defines the genre for me: adventure, puzzles, and humor, all mixed into a palatable package. These kids with their Bioshocks and Dead Spaces don’t know what they’re missing.

You can read the rest here or just start downloading Leisure Suit Larry here.


Malware Finds People Searching For Pirated Simpsons Episodes

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 08:30 AM PST

Just a friendly heads-up for those of you looking to stay as safe as possible in your online travels. A post on Kaspersky’s blog has warned of the dangers of trying to watch pirated TV shows online. In this example, an episode of The Simpsons, hosted on DailyMotion, sends the user on a wild goose chase, the end result of which a machine infected with something like MyWebSearch. You don’t want that nonsense gunking up your system.

The obvious solution to this is to not go hang out on some of the darker corners of the Internet, or if you do to make sure your anti-virus software is completely up-to-date. Whether you want to use a basic, free anti-virus software, or if you want to step up to a more premium, and thorough, anti-virus suite from the likes of McAfee or Kaspersky themselves—they just released the Pure Total Security suite, for example—that’s your call.

But for the love of God use something!


The Elusive White iPhone Appears On The German Apple Website [Update: Pulled!]

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 08:11 AM PST

Quick! Before it’s gone! Click over to the German Apple iPhone 4 vs iPhone 3GS page to see a pic of the white iPhone 4. It’s a tad small, but you get the idea. It’s just another piece of evidence in the developing case that the white iPhone is finally nearing release.

The phone was originally supposed to be release in the weeks following the iPhone 4′s launch date. But then it was pushed back. Again. And again. Until it was finally pulled completely from Apple’s website. Now a report surfaced claiming a new “miracle painting material” solved the previous issue.

Update: That was fast. Minutes after posting, the whole section shown in the screenshot of the translated German site disappeared! It’s a slippery devil.

Read More


AMD Inching Closer To ‘Green’ Processors With Next-Gen APUs

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 07:45 AM PST

Are graphics cards (and processors) now going green? AMD is certainly trying, having noted that its E-350 APU "demonstrated a significant reduction in the overall product 'carbon footprint'" compared to previous AMD Anthlon processors and Mobility Radeon graphics cards. We’re talking a 40 percent reduction in carbon emission over the life of the APU. This is the part where the smart-aleck know-it-all calls into our radio show and demands that all the egghead scientists complaining about global warming should come and plow his driveway. There’s a difference between weather and climate, sir. Calm down.

AMD says that the reduction in carbon emission is primarily due to lower energy consumption when in use. (AMD also made a few changes to its manufacturing process that helped lower carbon emissions in the actual production of the APU, which is also neat.)

The lower carbon footprint can also be attributed to the fact that a single APU does the job of both a CPU and GPU.

In other AMD news, did you guys see the leaked photos of the 6990, the next-gen dual GPU card? While it’s great that AMD is committed to dual GPU cards, perhaps 2011 should be the year when AMD also commits itself to changing people’s perceptions about its driver releases? No one’s asking for 15 percent performance increases every month, but a bit of stability, perhaps some extra love and care paid to CrossFire? Something along those lines.

Let 2011 be the year of rock solid driver releases. That would be swell.


Dell Hell Is Back: One Man’s Spiraling Journey Into The Heart Of Darkness

Posted: 27 Jan 2011 07:39 AM PST

I don’t like to call out bad customer service that often because the cases are often very time and place specific and mostly it’s a matter of misunderstandings all around. However, this one is too good to pass up. A reader, Blazej (he’s Polish), inexplicably purchased two Precision workstations and two 20-inch monitors from Dell on December 31. He paid extra for quick shipping waited for his items to arrive. The “Ship Fast” configuration should have arrived on 1/5/2011 but instead landed on 1/11/2011. That’s fine, right? A few days didn’t kill anyone. Dell gave him back $235.75 for the Ship Fast option. Then it gets better:

5. Now, we are moving to the issue #2: On 1/17/2011 I have received a solicitation, sent to my email address directly from Dell, and offering 35% discount on the entire combined ordered I placed just two-and-a-half weeks ago! This time Ship Fast was not excluded from the promotion. Therefore, if bought at that discount, I would pay $3,131.79 – an additional $548.46 discount that I find to be quite substantial.

That’s right: Dell sent him a 35% discount on his entire order – two weeks after it shipped. While in some worlds this can be seen as follow-up, in this case it’s kind of insult to injury. It’s obvious that Dell was trying to convince a novice IT person to keep outfitting his or her office with the same gear, but combined with the shipping snafu and the constant refusal to understand the real problem, Blazej understandably became aggrieved. When he tried to return the order

And the best part? The customer service reps kept calling him Blaze, like some sort of American Gladiator.

The order seems to have been stymied and the reader has his gear, but let this be a lesson to you: don’t try to use logic and a paper trail with Dell customer service. You’re asking for trouble.

Indeed, Ailleen, it seems that you have misunderstood me on quite a few points here (that were clearly stated in my previous correspondence).

But here it is again for your convenience:

1. On 12/31/2010 I have placed three orders on a Dell.com website:
a. Order #567639179, for Precision M4500, Fast Track C1, in the amount of $1,869;
b. Order #567639195, for Precision T3500 Base, Fast Track V2.1, in the amount of $ $1,249;
c. Order #567639963, for TWO 20" Dell 200FP Ultra Sharp Flat Panel Monitors, in the amount of $798.
The total price I was charged for was: $3,916.

2. On 1/4/2011 I received an email from Dell stating that Order #567639195 for Precision T3500 has been delayed; Estimated delivery I was given was 1/10/2011, later changed to 1/11/2010. Now, here was my initial problem (issue #1)): the ONLY reason I bought THIS system in a Ship Fast configuration was to have it on time, and that is on 1/5/2011, as it was promised (as that was true for the other Ship Fast order, being Order #567639179 – Precision M4500). By choosing Ship Fast option (for both systems), I gave up 25% discount I was entitled through a promotion code I had. Ship Fast was the excluded from this promotion.

3. Therefore, and because the delay in shipment was a violation of the Ship Fast terms of sale on a Dell's part, I asked to be reimbursed for the difference that would apply if I bought Precision T3500 not as a Ship Fast, but as a regular Workstation system with the current promotion of 25% off. The difference was $235.75.

4. I received this reimbursement, although for some reason it was applied to as a discount to Order #567639179 – Precision M4500. This order had clearly nothing to do with my issue. With this reduction taken into consideration, the total purchase price I paid for all I bought was down to $3,680.25.

5. Now, we are moving to the issue #2: On 1/17/2011 I have received a solicitation, sent to my email address directly from Dell, and offering 35% discount on the entire combined ordered I placed just two-and-a-half weeks ago! This time Ship Fast was not excluded from the promotion. Therefore, if bought at that discount, I would pay $3,131.79 – an additional $548.46 discount that I find to be quite substantial.

6. The offer to buy at the 35% discount was sent to me again on 1/20/2011. I have been already communicating this to your customer service, asking for the price match.

These are the facts. What remains is the whole extremely unpleasant experience of dealing with your customer service. I am really thinking of making a blog post out of this, and I think it would get me some audience. The last chapter is your "prompt response" (came in today) to my email sent to you on Monday, 1/24, that was the last day I could re-purchase the systems online with the given discount of 35%. But guess what, I have not been sent the proper answer to my question about the restocking charge (asked a few times in a few separate emails), nor have been emailed the proper return labels for my ENTIRE purchase that I clearly indicated I was intending to return.

So now, I guess, I will be stuck with what I have (no reason to return it now if I can no longer buy it back with a discount). Maybe the ads on my website will at least pay me back for the lost time and hope…

And my name is Blazej.

From: US_ABU_CustomerCare_BSD [mailto:US_ABU_CustomerCare_BSD@dell.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:18 PM
To: b@a.com
Subject: Re: DELL CUSTOMER CARE SR# 828817731 CASE MANAGERS EMAIL (KMM120239227I57L0KM)

Hi Blaze,

We have provided you all options. We are just waiting for the return of your Precision M4500 Fast track order. Let me know if this is the wrong order I have understood you returning to us.

Regards,
Ailleen

Original Message Follows:
————————

Ailleen,

It has been my worst customer service experience with DELL ever. Today is
the last day I can take advantage of the 35% discount on the stuff I
purchased from you. You have never gave me the proper explanation that
would reflect ALL the items I purchased, and even when emailing me the
return instructions, you have only addressed Precision M4500 workstation.
I also bought T3500 + 2x 200FP. If I can not receive the price match on
all items, I want to return them all. I need to know I will receive
complete refund for the money I spent, and won’t be charged with any
restocking fees. You have never confirmed that, either. I believe I have
a great case now for the wider audience on why they should be very careful
when doing business with you. Very sad. Please, let me know at your
earliest convenience if there is anything else you can do for me to change
this opinion.

Thanks,
Blazej

On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:06:50 -0800, wrote:
> Ailleen,
>
> I have just received your second email regarding the return, but it is
> just
> for PRECISION M4500, FAST TRACK C1 return, omitting PRECISION M3500 FAST
> TRACK & two ULTRA SHARP 2007FP monitors that I have also purchased in the
> same order (actually the monitors were ordered separately but came
> together
> with T3500).
>
> Now I think we have misunderstood each other:
>
> I spent a total of $3,680.25 (+tax) for the whole purchase (including the
> received $235.75 discount that was applied only to M4500 — again,
> incorrectly, for it was T3500 that was delayed).
>
> Now, if I was to re purchase this combined system again, including 35%
off
> offer, I would pay $3,131.79 (+tax), hence the difference of $548.46
> (+tax)
> that i requested to be reimbursed for applies to the WHOLE purchase, and
> not only the M4500.
>
> Maybe this will help you to understand my frustration.
>
> If I can not get the discount I want to return the whole package –
M4500,
> T3500 + 2x 2007FP.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Blazej
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:28:48 -0600 (CST), US_ABU_CustomerCare_BSD
> wrote:
>> Hi Blaze,
>>
>> I would understand your option to return instead. I have authorized the
>> return today. Please find below our return instructions. Please be
>> reminded that you will receive a separate email on the drop off waybill,
>> and that credit will only start processing the as soon as the package is
>> received here at our facilities. Jen one of our Resolution Specialist
> will
>> monitor the progress of your return request with us until we have
> completed
>> the process. Also, since we have already provided you credit of 235.75,
>> this will be deducted from the total amount you paid for this order.
>>
>> 1. Please make sure that the item is all boxed up neatly and properly.
>> Please send the item back in its original packaging and please also
> include
>> all items on the original shipment. If the original box is not available
>> anymore, you can use any box as long as it�s sturdy and won�t damage
>> the item. The waybill is neatly attached on top of the box where our
>> Returns Team can clearly see it.
>> 2. Please make sure to write the RMA number 141023326 outside the
> shipping
>> box so our Returns Team would easily identify the item you are
> returning.
>> 3. You are only allowed a maximum of 10days to return the item back to
>> Dell, otherwise, your return request will be closed, and the waybill
> issued
>> will expire.
>> 4. Credit will only start processing after we have received the item
> back
>> here at Dell.
>> 5. Depending on your bank�s bill cutoff date, maximum of days to
> process
>> the credit will be 30days from date of receipt of the item here at Dell.
>> 6. Your return request has been assigned to service request# 828817731
>> 7. A drop off waybill will be sent to you on a separate email, shipping
>> charges back to Dell will be shouldered by us; you would need to drop
> off
>> the package at any nearest UPS outlet in your area. Print out the
> waybill
>> and stick it on top of the box.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ailleen Moreno
>> SMB Customer Care Case Manager
>> Dell | CSMB Customer Care
>> My work schedule is: 7:00am ? 4:00pm CST Monday to Friday
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Original Message Follows:
>> ————————
>> It is simply a rip off. The credit I have received was due to YOU being
>> LATE with the promised delivery, as per your Ships Fast offering. You
> have
>> not fulfilled your promise of the next business day shipment and this
>> constituted the breach of terms of sale on YOUR side.
>>
>> Emailing me two separate 35% off offers in a few days following my
>> purchase, and than not being willing to match it, is simply non ethical
> and
>> non professional behavior.
>>
>> I will return the merchandise, won’t buy from you guys again, and warn
> all
>> my friends and colleagues to do the same.
>>

>>
>> Thank you very much for looking so closely into my case. I am sure you
>> have many satisfied customers by treating them accordingly, but you have
>> just lost one (if you even care).
>>
>> PS. I want to make sure I will be reimbursed with the whole amount I
> paid
>> for the merchandise upon returning it (less late delivery concession),
> and
>> not be charged with any re stocking fees. Please, confirm. Also let me
>> know about the return procedure.
>>
>> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>>
>> —–Original Message—–
>> From: US_ABU_CustomerCare_BSD
>> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:13:29
>> To:
>> Subject: DELL CUSTOMER CARE SR# 828817731 CASE MANAGERS EMAIL
>> (KMM120051771I57L0KM)
>>
>> Hi Blazej,
>>
>> I am one of the Case Managers here at Dell Customer Care Small and
> Medium
>> Business Segment, and I am sending you this email in response to your
> email
>> below. I see that you were already granted the inital credit of $235.75
>> with your initial email with us last 01/09/2011. Because of this, we
> can
>> no longer grant your second request. In case you have further questions
>> regarding this, you may revert back to your terms and agreement of sale
> in
>> which you agreed upon before buying from us. It is also found at
>> www.dell.com/ .
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ailleen Moreno
>> SMB Customer Care Case Manager
>> Dell | CSMB Customer Care
>>
>> My work schedule is: 7:00am ? 4:00pm CST Monday to Friday
>>
>> For order or replacement status, please click on the link:
>> https://support.dell.com/support/order/status.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=gen
>> For technical issues, please click on the link:
>> http://support.dell.com/support/index.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=gen&~ck=mn
>> For your account in our website, please send an email to
>> global_my_account_admin@dell.com
>>
>> Confidentiality Notice | This e-mail message, including any attachments,
>> is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
>> confidential or proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use,
>> disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, immediately contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all
>> copies of the original message.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Original Message Follows: ————————
>>
>>
>> Today I have received a second email (attached), offering me 35% off the
>> systems I have purchased less than three weeks ago at the face value. I
>> again kindly request a price match for the full price difference. If
> you
>> are unable to process this request in your capacity, please forward it
> to
>> your manager. And you are incorrect saying that I have already received
> a
>> partial discount for the price-drop ? this discount was applied due to
> your
>> delivery delay and not meeting the promises of your service (it should
>> have, by the way, been applied to the Precision T3500 workstation, and
> not
>> M4500 that your invoice indicates).
>>
>> This way or another, I have significantly overpaid for the systems I
>> purchased by the exact amount of $585.46+tax, and I do not care about
> you
>> voicing your opinion of whether or not it means a lot to me. I want to
>> keep the systems and not to go into a return and repurchase procedure,
> and
>> I would like to be transfer to the competent people who can address this
>> issue properly. Otherwise I won?t hesitate to voice out my opinion on
> some
>> different forums.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Blazej
>>
>>
>> From:US_ABU_CustomerCare_BSD [mailto:US_ABU_CustomerCare_BSD@dell.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 6:32 PM
>> To: b@a.com
>> Subject: RE: Dell Service Request# 828817731 (KMM120035976I57L0KM)
>>
>>
>> Hello Mr. ,
>> Good afternoon.
>> My name is Jen and I am sending you this email on behalf of my colleague
>> Jaypee. He has been out of the office since yesterday as he is sick.
>> I have read the details of your concern and I understand that it really
>> means a lot to you to get the addditional discount of $585.46+tax.
>> Unfortunately, a discount for a price drop has been issued to you
> already
>> previously as a one-tme courtesy therefore, we are unable to get you
>> another discount as much as we would like to.
>> It is not our intention to make your life miserable but there are
>> situations that are outside of our expectation. If you would really like
> to
>> get the system in the the current promotion that it is offered, we can
>> process a return authorization for you and credit you back your money
> less
>> the $249.90 that was credited to you previously. Please let us know if
> you
>> would like us to send you a return label or if you want us to schedule a
>> pick-up for the item.
>> Thank you.
>> Sincerely,
>> Jenelyn Lipata
>> SMB Customer Care Resolution Expert
>> Dell | CSMB Customer Care
>> My work schedule is: 7:00 am 4:00 pm CST Monday to Friday
>> Customer feedback | How am I doing? Please contact my manager
>> Jing_Aguila@dell.com with any feedback.
>> For order or replacement status, please click on the link:
>> https://support.dell.com/support/order/status.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=gen
>> For technical issues, please click on the link:
>> http://support.dell.com/support/index.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=gen&~ck=mn
>> For your account in our website, please send an email to
>> global_my_account_admin@dell.com
>> Confidentiality Notice | This e-mail message, including any attachments,
>> is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
>> confidential or proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use,
>> disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, immediately contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all
>> copies of the original message.
>>
>> Original Message Follows: ————————
>>
>>
>> Jaypee,
>>
>> First, regarding your ?policies governing my terms of sale?: I believe
>> they have been changed when you emailed me your offer of 35% off of the
>> exact same systems I have just purchased (emailed offer and the screen
>> shots of the potential purchase with the discounts applied are
> attached).
>
>>
>> Secondly, what you called ?impractical? is simply ?illogical? to me:
>> sending the systems I already have back to you and ordering the exact
> same
>> ones to than receive the discount without the problem. You will not
> gain
>> anything from this operation, however, it will make my life miserable by
>> having me ship the merchandise back to you, making me wait for the
> credit
>> to be applied to my account, and finally making me wait again for your
> new
>> shipment to arrive (hopefully on time, as scheduled). None of the other
>> reputable companies I did business with in the past would do such a
> thing
>> to its customer, and I would expect better from DELL.
>>
>> And as a matter of fact, I do even have a little example for you: two
>> months ago I purchased as a Christmas gift a beautiful (and quite
>> expensive) watch from Ashford.com. I received a special discount at the
>> time of purchase ? 10% off for Hamilton brand. Shortly after the watch
> has
>> arrived to my home (within two weeks time, to be exact ? so exactly like
> in
>> my case with DELL), Ashford had it on sale on its website. I have
>> requested a price match and was granted one without any problem ?
> please,
>> see attached correspondence. Now that is what I call a ?Customer
> Service?.
>> I will surely buy from them again, knowing that they will take care of
> me
>> and provide me with the best price they offer their merchandise at.
>>
>> Now, if this is not something your department can handle, I would kindly
>> ask you to direct my request to the appropriate one. And I am sure we
> do
>> not need to go as high up as to Mr. Dell himself.
>>
>> Finally, regarding the first two sentences of your previous note: thank
>> you for your kind understanding of how important the value of the proper
>> cost keeping for any type of business is, and especially for a small
>> business that closely shares its costs with the personal ones of the
> people
>> who run it. Not even mentioning the state of the current economy. And
>> while this $585.46 +tax probably makes no difference to your books, it
>> surely does to mine.
>>
>> Thank you and I look forward to hearing back from you.
>>
>> With regards,
>>
>> Blazej
>> >>
>>
>> From:US_ABU_CustomerCare_BSD [mailto:US_ABU_CustomerCare_BSD@dell.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:22 PM
>> To: b@a.com
>> Subject: Re: Dell Service Request# 828817731 (KMM119926046I57L0KM)
>>
>> Mr. ,
>> Please be assured that I could understand your point and the value that
>> you would be saving should the credit be applied. You could trust that I
>> know how important this would be especially for a business. However, we
> are
>> limited and bound by the policies governing your terms of sale. Should
> you
>> decide to return and reorder, I can request a return authorization for
> the
>> full amount of your order minus the amount we have already refunded to
> your
>> account. The credit processing for a return may take 7-10 business days
>> once the product is back at Dell. I can issue you a prepaid return label
> to
>> cover for the complete shipping fee back to Dell. I know that this may
>> sound impractical but there could only be such an amount that we here at
>> customer service could handle. I look forward to your email with your
>> decision regarding the matter.
>> I appreciate your kind understanding.
>> Thanks,
>> Jaypee Alfonso
>> SMB Customer Care Resolution
>> Dell | CSMB Customer Care
>> Office phone number: 800-456-3355 ext 4250549
>> Office Hours: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM CST
>> Customer feedback | How am I doing? Please contact my manager
>> mailto:Jing_Aguila@dell.com with any feedback.
>> For order or replacement status, please click on the link:
>> https://support.dell.com/support/order/status.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=gen
>> For technical issues, please click on the link:
>> http://support.dell.com/support/index.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=gen&~ck=mn
>> For your account in our website, please send an email to
>> global_my_account_admin@dell.com
>> Confidentiality Notice | This e-mail message, including any attachments,
>> is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
>> confidential or proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use,
>> disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, immediately contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all
>> copies of the original message.
>>
>> Original Message Follows: ————————
>> The difference is too significant. If this really can not be resolved to
>> my advantage (and I find it to be a fair solution, as per your
> offering),
> I
>> will return the merchandise and make the purchase again — this makes
> the
>> only sense to me. Please, advise.
>> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>>
>> From: US_ABU_CustomerCare_BSD
>> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:15:10 -0600 (CST)
>> To:
>> Subject: Dell Service Request# 828817731 (KMM119870385I57L0KM)
>>
>> Hi Blaze ,
>> Good morning.
>> It’s good to know that the initial credit we requested for $235.75 has
>> been completed while I was away from the office. I believe that Emmie
> was
>> able to send you a credit invoice for the amount. Regarding your new
>> request for a price match using your new e-coupon, I would like to
>> apologize but we will be unable to fulfill your request. This is due to
> the
>> fact that the e-coupons may only be applied at point of sale.
>> Thanks,
>> Jaypee Alfonso
>> SMB Customer Care Resolution
>> Dell | CSMB Customer Care
>> Office phone number: 800-456-3355 ext 4250549
>> Office Hours: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM CST
>> Customer feedback | How am I doing? Please contact my manager
>> mailto:Jing_Aguila@dell.com with any feedback.
>> For order or replacement status, please click on the link:
>> https://support.dell.com/support/order/status.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=gen
>> For technical issues, please click on the link:
>> http://support.dell.com/support/index.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=gen&~ck=mn
>> For your account in our website, please send an email to
>> global_my_account_admin@dell.com
>> Confidentiality Notice | This e-mail message, including any attachments,
>> is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
>> confidential or proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use,
>> disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, immediately contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all
>> copies of the original message.
>>
>>
>> Original Message Follows: ————————
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Emmie,
>>
>> I guess this will qualify for the new service request ticket, but since
> it
>> is related to the same purchase, I am attaching it to our previous
>> correspondence, as per below:
>>
>> Today, I have just received a new offer from Dell Small Business, for
> the
>> discount of 35% off of the total purchase price of qualified Dell
>> Workstations (coupon code B6BLL1NM9KTLDS); I have verified that the code
> I
>> was given actually works with all the items I have ordered two+ weeks
> ago,
>> so I hope the price I have paid will be matched to reflect your new
> offer.
>>
>>
>> To summarize, this is what I have paid for my items in the pre-tax and
>> after-tax prices:
>>
>> 1. Ships Fast Dell Precision T3500 Workstation + 2 Ultra Sharp
>> Monitors 2007FP ? a system worth $1,617 + 798 = $2,415.00. Less
> discount
>> received: $368 (instantly at purchase). PRICE PAID: $2,047.
>> 2. Ships Fast Dell Precision M4500 Workstation: $2,403. Less
>> discount received: $534 (instantly at purchase) + $235.75 (as per below)
> =
>> $769.75. PRICE PAID: $1633.25
>>
>> TOTAL PRICE PAID: $3,680.25 (net); $3,901.07 (with 6% CT sales tax)
>>
>> Now, if bought today with this new 35% discount, the price would look as
>> follow:
>>
>> 1. T3500 + 2 monitor system: $2,415; less 35% = $1,569.75
>> 2. M4500: $2,403; less 35% = $1,561.95
>>
>> Which gives a new TOTAL of: $3,131.79 (net); $3,319.60 (after sales tax)
>
>>
>> Therefore, the new difference I would like to be reimbursed to my
> account
>> is $548.46 (net); $581.37 (after tax)
>>
>> While I do realize that the prices of electronics always go down and not
>> up, especially when new technology arrives; at the same time, however,
> we
>> are still within 30 days (20 to be exact) from my original purchase, and
>> the difference in price is substantial. Moreover, since I have been
>> contacted directly with this new offer, I hope it will be granted to me.
>
>>
>> Thank you very much again for your kind and positive consideration.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Blazej
>> >>
>>
>> From:US_ABU_CustomerCare_BSD [mailto:US_ABU_CustomerCare_BSD@dell.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 12:48 PM
>> To: b@a.com
>> Subject: Re: Dell Support Request: Pricing/Promotion Question
>> (KMM119743993I57L0KM)
>>
>> Dear Blaze ,
>>
>> How are you? My name is Emmie, I am colleague of Jaypee and your inquiry
>> was assigned to me since he is away due to sickness. I was reviewing
> your
>> concern and I see that he processed a credit for you for $235.75.
>>
>> I am glad to inform you that it has been completed and you were credited
>> $249.90 on your account. I have attached here the credit memo for your
>> reference too.
>>
>> I want to make sure that your issue has been resolved to your
>> satisfaction. We will be waiting for your response within 24-48 hours,
>> otherwise we will be closing the service request and will consider your
>> issue resolved.
>>
>> We appreciate your business and thank you again for choosing Dell.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Emmie Lou Punzalan
>> SMB Customer Care Resolution Expert
>> Dell | CSMB Customer Care
>> Office : +1 800 2843355 x 4250586
>>
>> My work schedule is: 8:00am to 5:00am CST Monday to Friday OR 9:00am to
>> 6:00am CST Monday to Friday
>>
>> Customer feedback | How am I doing? Please contact my manager
>> Jing_Aguila@dell.com with any feedback.
>>
>> For order or replacement status, please click on the link:
>> https://support.dell.com/support/order/status.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=gen
>> For technical issues, please click on the link:
>> http://support.dell.com/support/index.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=gen&~ck=mn
>> For your account in our website, please send an email to
>> global_my_account_admin@dell.com
>>
>> Confidentiality Notice | This e-mail message, including any attachments,
>> is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
>> confidential or proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use,
>> disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, immediately contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all
>> copies of the original message.
>>
>>
>> Previous Reply Follows:
>> ———————–
>> Hi Blaze ,
>>
>> Good day.
>>
>> I am the Resolution Specialist who will help you resolve your issue
> today.
>> I have reviewed your request and I could understand how sensitive
> schedule
>> can be especially for a business. I have submitted a request for the
> amount
>> of $235.75. Please be reminded this is subject for approval. Please
> allow
>> 24-48 hours for processing. I’ll let you know as soon as I get word from
>> our financial department.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jaypee Alfonso
>> SMB Customer Care Resolution
>> Dell | CSMB Customer Care
>> Office phone number: 800-456-3355 ext 4250549
>> Office Hours: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM CST
>>
>> Customer feedback | How am I doing? Please contact my manager
>> mailto:Jing_Aguila@dell.com with any feedback.
>>
>> For order or replacement status, please click on the link:
>> https://support.dell.com/support/order/status.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=gen
>> For technical issues, please click on the link:
>> http://support.dell.com/support/index.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=gen&~ck=mn
>> For your account in our website, please send an email to
>> global_my_account_admin@dell.com
>>
>> Confidentiality Notice | This e-mail message, including any attachments,
>> is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
>> confidential or proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, use,
>> disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, immediately contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all
>> copies of the original message.
>>
>>
>> Original Message Follows:
>> ————————
>> * * * PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE THE SUBJECT WHEN REPLYING * * *
>> *** This is a feedback Message from the Dell Online Communications
> Center.
>> ***
>> ******************************************************************
>>
>> Customer Information:
>> ***********************************************
>> Requesting Organization(Empty for DHS) =
>> Name = Blazej
>> Customer Number =
>> Requestor E-Mail =b@a.com
>> Contact Phone =
>> Service Tag =
>> Case Number =
>> Order Number =
>> Issue Category = Pricing/Promotion Question
>> Year Of Birth = NA
>> ***********************************************
>> Ship To Address:
>>
>> Cos Cob, CT 06807-
>> Bill To Address :
>>
>> Cos Cob, CT 06807-
>> ***********************************************
>> Problem Description:
>>
>> To Whom It May Concern:
>>
>> I ordered Dell Precision T3500 system on Dec. 31, 2010, choosing Ships
>> Fast option, promissing shipping the next business day and delivery on
>> January 7, 2011. It did not happen, I am sitll waiting. Prompt
> delivery
>> was my only consideration for choosing “Ships Fast” for the
>> system being the only one for which I could not use my discount coupon
> of
>> 25%! I have also ordered two monitorts that day, and my entire order
> for
>> this system before any discount was exactly 1617+798=$2,425.00.
> Therefore,
>> if I would not be using Ships Fast but configure this myself in the same
>> manner, I would qualify for $603.75 discount instead of received $368.
> The
>> difference is $235.75, and I kindly request to be compensated by this
>> amount.
>>
>> I also bought Precision M4500 Workstation in the same order.
>>
>> I look forward to hearing back from you and thank you in advance for
> your
>> kind consideration.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Blazej
>>
>>
>> ***********************************************
>> Sent To: us_bcsd@dell.com
>> Referring URL: 68.198.59.29
>> Date Submitted: 1/9/2011
>> Date Received(K): 1/9/11 06:43:43 PM
>>


No comments:

Post a Comment